A Deeper Meaning Behind Youth Sports Participation

Principles of Greatness: A Visual Demonstration by Profiles International

To aspire to be something more, whether in sports, music, art, school, the workplace, or life in general, is a goal that few could argue with. The difficulty comes when contemplating the depth and breadth of what this actually means.

I like to think of that “something more” from the standpoint of what we have, or are able to develop, on the inside. Those positive intrinsic attributes which set a person apart from the group, that create the ability to achieve what others only think of, that govern our life choices and aid in building strong character.

Participation in youth sports, at least from my perspective, is merely one tool to this end. A very good tool I might add, but a tool nevertheless (one which is only as good, or bad, based on how it is used). An environment that gives opportunity to practice, develop, and reveal the many foundational principles I refer to above and frequently discuss in my blogs. And many are principles that form the foundation from which Becoming a True Champion builds its framework, the book for which I am seeking publication.

In an attempt to bring a more concrete view to the intrinsic components we all should aspire to, I have again discovered a video on YouTube (created by Profiles International) that truly does justice to the meaning of “becoming something more.”

Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaMwLp9be8w

5
Average: 5 (1 vote)

Personal Ownership and Responsibility for Creating Athletic Success: Part 2

In an effort to further demonstrate this idea of Personal Ownership and Responsibility in Creating Athletic Success let me also relay to you a true event that occurred while watching my own kid play soccer on their high school team. It is customary for me to sit fairly quietly during games and just watch, giving only positive support when good shots, passes, or plays take place.

About mid-way through the game, a pass was made to a player nearing the goal, that player settled the ball and promptly took a shot that went pretty wide right of the target. The player’s parent was sitting in the bleachers in front of me and showed a slight level of disappointment but nothing out of the ordinary. A little while later the same thing occurred, only this time the shot went well over the goal post. A little more emphatic was the disgust, but again nothing that anyone could really hear unless you were sitting right there. It was not too long after that, the same player took a third shot that was, again, far off the mark.

Now I am not sure whether it was the fact that my kid was a senior captain and had played on the varsity team all four years or that this parent knew I was a teacher and had coached sports at the high school level or something else, but after that missed shot, the parent turned directly toward me and stated that the coach needs to spend more time with the team practicing shooting, and that their kid was much better at putting shots on goal during the club season. My response was simple and came directly from the principle concept I have been discussing in this post. I replied, “If an athlete is not happy with the amount of practice time spent on shooting and they feel they need more focused time on this skill, why don’t they take a ball and train this skill on their own after practice is over?” The parent looked at me for a moment or two, giving no response, and then turned back to watch the rest of the game.

My hope was that this parent understood the meaning behind my comment of encouraging their young athlete to take responsibility for making themselves better rather than leaving it up to someone else. You see, to me it was really irrelevant whether the coach spent time on shooting or not. I did not feel that my job as a parent of an athlete on the team was to try and evaluate what the team’s training needs were. I am only there to support and encourage, not to criticize and second guess. In addition, I have no idea how much time the coach spends on shooting, whether he feels he has other more important priorities for practice at this stage of the season (especially since practice time is governed by the amount of daylight), or whether he spends half the practice on this skill. And even if I knew that information and did not agree with what was being done at practice, I am extremely reluctant to criticize another coach’s training. Nothing positive will come out of doing that, plus, who is to say I am right? I learned a long time ago that there is almost always more than one right way to accomplish something and what might work best for me may not work best for someone else. So, I saw my job as a parent of a daughter on this team as one of support and encouragement—that is it. (In fact, I have a standing rule for myself, unless what the coach is doing endangers the health and safety of my child, it is up to my child to work out the issue they are having. Find a way, I always say!)

I am under the firm belief that it is this attitude of taking Personal Ownership and Responsibility in Creating Athletic Success that allows athletes, and teams, to reach levels of success others only dream of. That when one adopts this concept as part of their foundational belief system, doors of further opportunity open up for them, and more control over what happens to them becomes theirs to decide. As I have said before in other blog posts, that is when the impossible becomes possible.

There was a time when I assumed that my strong belief in this principle developed through the adversity I faced in the high school athletic experience I mentioned briefly in a previous blog post From the Athletes Perspective (http://www.momsteam.com/node/1290, http://becomingatruechampion.blogspot.com/2008/06/from-athletes-perspect...). However, as we all grow older, and hopefully wiser, we start to reflect on the many happenings that occur throughout our life. The same is true for me, and I came to realize that it was actually my father who had planted the seed for this idea of personal ownership and responsibility. The athletic experience I had in high school was merely a situation for further growth of this seed that had been planted much earlier.

One day, when I was only about 5 years old, I remember coming in the house in tears to complain to my father that some bigger boys (of my own age) were picking on me. My dad was in the bathroom shaving as he listened to me babble through tears my complaint. Once I had finished my tearful jabber, and sympathetic requests for him to come out and take care of these guys for me, he turned to me and said “Gee, Kirk that’s terrible, what are YOU going to do about that?” I was completely taken aback by his response (since I fully expected him to come out with me) and distinctly remember, even at 5, thinking about the expectation that my father trusts and expects me to take care of this myself. I think it was at that moment that I realized, as well as a 5 year old can, that if I did not like something or wanted something, that the responsibility for taking the action needed was mine. To be completely honest, I don’t even remember what I did about the “bullies” down the block, but I most certainly remember this situation and the feelings of empowerment it left me with. It is so funny how clear some memories of early childhood experiences can be while others are just fleeting moments in time that disappear forever. This particular one certainly had an impact.

My purpose in telling that story is just to show how the little seeds of personal responsibility can be sown at fairly young ages. The situation does not have to be as drastic as the one I experienced. In fact, any situation where it is safe for a child to engage in personal ownership, and be expected to do this with the trust and confidence of his or her parents, can help support the belief in oneself of Personal Ownership and Responsibility for Creating Athletic Success, or any success for that matter.

Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion

0

Personal Ownership and Responsibility for Creating Athletic Success: Part 1

In order to best explain what I mean by the individual athlete taking personal ownership and responsibility for creating athletic success, let me develop an analogy that might help demonstrate this concept and the choices/options that go along with it.

Let’s say that a female athlete wants to become a very good volleyball player. She loves playing the game and has a real passion for the sport, along with some good athletic talent. However, the coach and program at her high school is not on par with the level of play this athlete wants to achieve. In fact, very little time is spent at practice on drills and situational play that focus on improving the base fundamentals and individual skills of the game (something all athletes at all levels need to continually and consistently work and improve on). The majority of practice is spent scrimmaging and playing various team games. Fun, yes, important, yes (at times), but without the right balance of fundamental skill work throughout the season, not very developmental.

I know that in most cases like this, many, including the athlete, tend to place blame and responsibility on the coach if they do not do well. The perspective, and comments, from the athlete, teammates (and probably parents too) would go something like, “we won’t ever be any good because our coach sucks.” I cannot begin to tell you the number of times I have heard comments very similar to or just like this from both athletes and parents in comparable scenarios. Maybe the coach is respected with a good track record, but people don’t believe he or she spends practice time on the right things. Or maybe it is believed that he or she plays their “favorites” over the “best” players during games. Maybe the coach “was” very good at one time but just seems to want to collect a paycheck and go home, not putting in much effort. Or possibly the coach has great intentions but truly is lacking in the type of knowledge that could really help the athletes. Or maybe the coach is just a volunteer who has never played sports and is filling in for the season. No matter what the scenario, even though there might be some (or even many) elements of truth, the usual end result of not being successful is that it is “his or her fault” (the coach’s), “not mine” (the athlete’s).

When this happens, the responsibility for the athlete’s success (or improvement) is taken completely off their shoulders and placed somewhere else. Excuses are ready made and easy to accept. In essence, they give up control over being able to make a difference for themselves, and their team. On the other hand, if the “athlete’s perspective” was one in which they accepted the environmental “cards” they have been dealt, taking full responsibility for the efforts they personally must put in in order to accomplish what they want, then a lot of positive things can start to happen for the athlete.

They learn to:

** focus on the things they do have control over; like their choices (the ones that either enhance or detract from their possible success).

** accept things that they have no control over (like their coach, practice facility or referee), making them less of a burden.

** open up thought processes that create opportunity by forcing the athlete to think about what they actually need to do and how to do it.

** take on the responsibility of prioritizing what they need to work on and organize their own time (whether inside or outside of practice) to accomplish this.

** adapt to the existing environment rather than expecting it to adapt to them.

** build levels of self-esteem from the inside-out rather than the expectation of it having to come from the outside-in.

All of these thought processes are positive, life-long attributes applicable to success beyond the athletic arena.

Now how might this apply to our female volleyball player? Well, based on the scenario I created, you can see the athlete has the scrimmage time she requires. What is lacking is the fundamental and skill development needed to reach higher levels of play, and maybe the conditioning to go along with this. It may take some doing on the athlete’s part due to the team nature of volleyball, and the need for a partner to help with the skill work, but 20 – 45 minutes of well-focused extra time beyond normal practice (or during practice while they are out), 2 or 3 days a week – maybe less, training parts of the game they feel they are not getting, could make a huge difference.

Basically the athlete herself would take on an attitude personified by this statement, “Ok, if I am not getting what I need and/or want out of normal practice, then I will find a way to get it myself.” She not only accepts responsibility for what happens to her, she takes full control of making it happen. And with a little thought, a person can find a way to use this perspective in just about any scenario of adversity they face, whether athletic or otherwise.

With the intention of visually demonstrating this perspective, let me refer you to a couple of videos I have previously posted in my blog. I apologize if you have seen them before, whether here or somewhere else, but I think them significant enough to review again. Hopefully they make a deep and lasting impression on how important this concept is in helping an athlete tackle adversity and obstacles on the road to success. Keep in mind as you watch them how each, in their own way, symbolizes or inspires the intrinsic component of Personal Ownership and Responsibility for Creating Athletic Success.

http://www.momsteam.com/node/1013

http://www.momsteam.com/node/1016

http://www.momsteam.com/node/1018

(Note: Personally, I cannot watch any of these without emotional and inspirational feelings welling up inside. They bring me right back to my competitive days long gone by.)

Part 2 Coming Next Week!!!

Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion

5
Average: 5 (1 vote)

From The Athlete’s Perspective

Much of what I discuss in my blog and in my book Becoming a True Champion, centers on the teenage athlete (up to any age) and the perspective they should take in order to gain what they could out of their athletic experiences. Through my years as high school teacher and coach, I have come to the conclusion that the more responsibility an athlete takes for the things they would like to achieve, the more control they have over the possibility of accomplishing what they want. It is this type of attitude that makes the seemingly impossible become possible.

The strong foundation for my attitude on the concept of the athlete’s perspective grew out of a seed planted long ago gaining fruition through a life-changing occurrence in which the direction of my life changed, or actually gained direction, based on a very inspirational experience I had as an athlete in high school. It is what I learned through that experience (an epiphany of sorts), in combination with my educational, teaching, and coaching background, that has helped to create my focus from the “athlete’s perspective.”

It is commonly understood that when children are younger their parents, coaches, teachers and other adults in their life play a very important, or essential, role in creating a healthy developmental environment for kids and, in the context of this blog, young athletes. The choices we make and parameters we set, at the younger ages, help determine the foundations from which they make their own decisions and set their own parameters. (At least that is our hope). However, there comes a point in time when children become adolescents and young adults, full of their own desire to assert their own uniqueness. It is during this time that adult influence seems to have much less impact. That is not to say that creating a healthy environment is not still of high priority and importance, or that still setting appropriate parameters is any less significant, just that a definite shift of assertiveness to making one’s own decisions and choices takes place in those pre-teen and teen years. This is no less true for kids involved in sports, and, in essence, it is the choices the young athlete makes themselves (on their own) that will become the essential piece to whether they gain the intrinsic values available through their sports experiences and/or achieve a solid understanding of what “true” success is really all about.

In other words, no matter how good a parent, coach, or program is it will be the choices that the individual athlete makes that will determine the successfulness of that individual athlete. It is not that the guiding influences mentioned above are of little importance, “actually, many people contribute to the success of any sport or athletic activity, whether it is a team or individual sport. So, of course, coaching, parental support and good programs are important factors. But it needs to be said more loudly and clearly that the importance of these factors is still secondary to the role young athletes themselves must play in creating their own success” (excerpt from Becoming a True Champion).

It is for this reason, in addition to the experiences I have had involving my own athletic, coaching, and teaching career and watching my own two daughters struggle through the adversity of their athletic careers (from youth through college) that I have centered my energy and focus on the perspective of the athlete. And not only for the purpose of helping the athlete better understand their role and responsibility in their own athletic success but also, and just as important, to help parents better understand this perspective so as to aid in supporting personal ownership for this in their young athlete.

With the positive influences that MomsTeam is bringing to the current youth sports environment, in combination with teaching young athletes how they can succeed regardless of the environmental “cards” they’ve been dealt, “making a difference” for young sports enthusiasts becomes more reality than just possibility.

This brings me to my next blog article where I will discuss in more detail the idea of personal ownership and responsibility in creating success and why it is so important to the success of young teen athletes.

 

Kirk Mango

Becoming a True Champion

4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Perspective in Youth Sports Today

As a teacher, former coach and elite level collegiate athlete (and father of two Division I scholarship athletes), I have been genuinely saddened by the loss of perspective in sports, especially youth sports, and the lack of understanding about how athletic success is achieved. What our young sports enthusiasts should be learning by going through this process and what they are learning are two different things. Intrinsic values like character, integrity, good sportsmanship, strong work ethics, priority-setting, commitment, and discipline, which were once thought of as cornerstones for young developing athletes (being tested and strengthened through their athletic experiences), have given way to athletes avoiding responsibility by blaming others for athletic shortcomings and valuing materialistic short-term motivations like scholarships, fame, fortune and the idea of “winning at all costs” as their primary reasons for sport participation. Obstacles that were once viewed as a means to test one's metal and develop one's perseverence are now looked at as being unfair, excessive, and unreasonable. Instead of taking legitimate personal responsibility to overcome a stumbling block, athletes are opting to either give up, give excuses, or find shortcuts to athletic success.

You need not look any further than our elite level and professional athletes in order to see the end result of these attitudes (exemplified by the recent release of the Mitchell Report regarding the steroid scandal in major league baseball). Poor examples abound in sports at this level, and it certainly is not moving toward a state of improvement—at least not yet.

That is a major reason behind the development of my blog The Athlete's Sports Experience: Making a Difference and my new book Becoming a True Champion: A Handbook for Young Athletes Aiming for Greatness (currently seeking publication). The book is written from the athlete’s perspective and, along with the blog, centers its discussion on making a real difference for young athletes, and their parents.

I plan to add blog entries on my feelings, impressions, experiences, and anything else that seems relative to youth sports and athletics here at MomsTeam and on my personal blog. Please feel free to comment on the various subjects I present and/or visit my website listed above in order to gain more insight on the athletic principles and life lessons I promote and support.


Sincerely,

Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion

PS – There is a link on the main page of my website for those interested in being notified about my book's publication. This is a private email list that will only be used for communication regarding Becoming a True Champion.
5
Average: 5 (2 votes)

Part 1: Specialization in Youth Sports, Good or Bad?

I have been debating for a while now on writing an article that focused on the growing trend for athletes to specialize in only one sport. It certainly is a hot topic in high school athletics, especially between coaches, parents, athletic directors, etc., and it definitely can create heated discussions between these parties due, in part, to strong opinions on the subject. I will be writing this article over the next two weeks and dividing it into 3 parts in order to break up its length. Below is part 1.

I would estimate that over the last two or three decades, there has been a definite decrease of the number of young athletes who participate in a variety of sports (usually referred to as the multi-sport athlete), especially at the high school level, and a definite increase in the number of athletes who focus their attention on only one sport. This begs to ask the question, as the title of this article indicates, whether this trend is a good thing or bad.

Well, there are certainly strong opinions on both sides of the fence of this issue, and both have sound reasoning behind their thought process. On the one hand, you have those who believe that specialization is hurting young athletes because it does not allow for the development of well roundedness in the individual. That it decreases an athlete’s ability to gain knowledge, skill, physical development, and benefits from a variety of sports and activities. That because of this it may hamper their interest as adults to stay active. That the increase in specialization has also coincided with the increase in sports burnout and overuse injuries – and keep in mind that many of the injuries occurring in young athletes today were rarely seen by medical professionals before specialization became popular. That the reason for specialization is due to the pressure that the athlete is getting from parents, coaches, and/or the athlete themselves, in order to gain a scholarship to college and/or compete at the highest level (none of which is too far off the mark, if at all).

It certainly is difficult to argue with the above reasoning, even though there does not seem to be a large amount of statistical research that proves everything listed above. From my perspective, however, I do believe all of it to be true, at least based on my experience as a physical educator, coach, and parent of two college-level athletes who have grown up in the current youth sports environment.

On the other side of this argument (having just as strong opinions, and basis for those opinions, as the supporters of multiple sport athletes) are the individuals who encourage sports specialization. This side of the fence encompasses those who believe that athletes need to dedicate time to a single sport in order to compete with the level of expertise that is out there today. That so many are choosing to specialize, and becoming much better in their sport of choice because of it, some may not even be able to make their high school teams if they don’t concentrate their efforts in one sport (much less a varsity team when they are older); thus, limiting their opportunity to participate altogether in something they love to do. That if they actually have any aspirations to compete beyond high school, specialization is not optional but a necessity. That if they truly are in it to see how good they can get, and in the end reach some level of mastery or their potential (and the self satisfaction that can come from this), then they must spend the kind of time in the gym that can only be attained through a strong focus in one sport.

My experience has also proven that for many, the above reasoning is true as well. I have seen, and coached, varsity level teams that athletes would not be able to make if they did not specialize. I also believe it to be a fact that the average athlete today, in just about every sport, is much better in knowledge, skill, and performance than the athlete of several decades ago, due in part to this specialization. And, I also know athletes who, if they had not specialized, would not have garnered the college scholarship they were seeking.

Now, I am well aware of the exception to the rule that the extremely gifted bring to the mix. You know the ones, those who have the genetic natural talent to play just about any sport, improve without seeming to try that hard, and even gain a college scholarship just by their sheer athleticism. The number of athletes fitting into this category is so small that they are not even really worth discussing in the context of this article. The vast majority of athletes just do not fit into this group, and even the exceptionally gifted have to bring more focus and concentration into their sport because their counterparts are doing just that. The small numbers of truly gifted are actually dwindling and the gap between them and those not in that category is actually shrinking as well. The bar has certainly been raised for everyone.

So what are athletes, and/or parents, to do in a situation like this where both sides have strong views and beliefs, and those views and beliefs have a good basis of support behind them. It is a very interesting dilemma that has many in a quandary over the appropriate path to take.

Article #2 will discuss this dilemma in greater detail and give suggestions and food for thought regarding both sides of the argument. STAY TUNED!!!

Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion
0

Steroids in Professional Sports and Youth Sports, WHY?

It is in the wake of the Mitchell Report, which sheds light on the pervasive use of performance-enhancing substances (Steroids, HGH, etc.) in professional baseball, that I direct this blog's attention to an article in the Sports Parenting e-magazine titled Denial, Apathy, and Win-at-All-Costs Sports Culture Fuels Steroid Abuse by Bruce Svare, Ph.D,
http://www.parentsforgoodsports.org/iPages.tpl?pg=articles/steroidAbuse.

In his article, Dr. Svare provides good insight into the “why” behind steroid use in sports today and suggests an approach that will decrease and deter the risk of their use by young athletes. It is his contention that the “winning at all costs” attitudes dominating professional and elite level sports, and filtering down into our sports society as a whole, is a major underlying factor in this issue. I wholly agree with this perspective and would only add that the amount of money, fame, and extravagant lifestyles our sports celebrities lead contributes greatly to this attitude. These extrinsic rewards have permeated sports at the highest levels giving many so-called sports “stars” the feeling that they are above the rules, and even above the law. You do not need to look very hard to find examples of this in the media, and the steroid scandals in sports today fit right in. It seems to me that whenever extrinsic motivators (rewards), like the ones mentioned above, become a primary goal for sports participation, then it is the athlete’s character that inevitably is sacrificed, in addition to the integrity of the sport diminishing.

Dr. Svare goes on to say that, "Denial, apathy and the desire to win also pervade the thinking of many overly competitive coaches and parents who frequently remark: ‘Steroids aren't a problem in our community,’" indicating that these attitudes have pierced the fabric of youth sports. This being the case then it is only logical to assume that the same issues, problems, and concerns regarding the use of performance-enhancing drugs will follow, and with a little research of your own you will find that they have.

What is the solution? Our attitudes about sports and the purpose behind why athletes play will need to change. The fun and true enjoyment (my next blog) of sports participation will need to come from somewhere and something other than the extrinsic rewards so many now hold in high regard. And where will this change need to occur? With the sports individuals of the future, our youth sports participants themselves. They control what will happen with sports in the years to come, and it is with them that we must all direct our focus.

I would encourage you to take the time to read Dr. Svare’s article. The information it provides and issue it raises is, from my standpoint, a very worthwhile read.
http://www.parentsforgoodsports.org/iPages.tpl?pg=articles/steroidAbuse

Published in: Sports Parenting e-Magazine (Nov.)
Parents for Good Sports, http://www.parentsforgoodsports.org/
Apathy, and Win-at-All-Costs Sports Culture Fuels Steroid Abuse

By Bruce Svare, Ph.D


Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion
0

The “FUN” in Sports Participation

Youth sports participation today has become more popular than ever. It is estimated that approximately 10 million high school age students participate in extracurricular athletic programs in the United States. If you take into account all sports participants from age 6 to 18 years of age, the number more than triples to approximately 32 million as reported by the National Council of Youth Sports (NCYS) in their 2000 census. And based on current trends, it is more than likely that these numbers will not be decreasing anytime soon.

Along with this increase in popularity has come a slew of articles discussing a variety of issues in youth sports, not the least of which centers on the loss of “fun” in sports participation for kids. You would be hard pressed to find any information (whether in a book, on the internet, or in your local newspaper) raising concerns over youth sports involvement that doesn’t mention the word fun somewhere, at least from the perspective of “loss of” or “need for” it. What I find most interesting is that few, if any, make an attempt to define what fun really means in sports. It is simply taken for granted that if it is not fun, it is not good, and if it is fun, it is. However, this leaves me with two more pressing questions, what does having “fun” really mean when it comes to sports participation and where does this “fun” come from?

These very questions draw my attention to several past comments made to me over the years by parents of, predominantly, collegiate athletes. Many of these interpretations, based mostly on their kid's experience, centered on the idea that sports (especially college sports) for their competing athlete had become like a job to them. That the time and effort they were, or had been, putting in had literally become “work”, and not the term work as in extra effort but work as in occupation. Basically, that playing sports for their young adults was not fun anymore. Even some college athletes (or their former high school coaches) that I have personally spoken to echo similar complaints. Some express their current dissatisfaction with their college sports experience, others leave college sports behind before their eligibility ends, and still others decide to never play their sport again. All because it is not fun anymore.

I can distinctly remember not being able to relate to these statements and being perplexed and confused by them. It was just so different for me. When I look back at my own experience as a high school and collegiate athlete, those types of thoughts never entered my mind. Sure I remember working hard and forcing myself to train and condition (my conditioning was extensive) at intense levels, and with high expectations, but I cannot remember one time where I felt like what I was doing was like a job, and I spent a lot of hours in the gym. I'd say around 5 hours a day 6 days a week. If it was possible, I would have continued 4 more years of collegiate competition, and the training that went with it.

For some reason, my perspective (or frame of reference) was completely different. I just never looked at my experience in the manner that the earlier examples demonstrate. So the big question then becomes, what made the difference in my perspective versus theirs?

Before I answer this, at least from my vantage point, let me talk a little bit about what I think makes sports fun to play. For younger participants, the key word is the last word used in my previous sentence “play.” That is what kids like to do, and that is what I liked to do, just play the game. You ask younger elementary school kids what their favorite class is and most will say physical education (or recess), at least that is the impression you get when you watch them in a physical education class at that age level. To them, just playing the game for the sake of playing is fun.

At some point, and I do not know exactly when this happens or the best time for it to happen (however, I do think this is very individual in nature), the competitive aspects of sports will become more important to an athletic child. Just playing the game will, and should, always be part of the fun in sports (it is part of developing and deepening a “love for the game”) but sooner or later a young competitive athlete themselves will want to become better or good at what they are doing, and they will derive less or more enjoyment out of playing sports based on their feelings about this. I know I did. In fact, I believe that where I learned to place my focus and what I decided was most important to me, with regard to competitive sports, had a great deal to do with my feelings about my own sports participation (not getting burned out or looking at it like a job), and in turn, any level of success I had.

There came a point in time (occurring when I developed those feelings of wanting to be good) that I started to place a higher level of importance on how good it felt to perform a skill well. I am not talking about the adulation one receives from others when hitting a home run in baseball, hitting an ace serve in tennis, or a spike in volleyball, but the actual positive internal feedback one gets from performing a skill at a higher level of competency than what one normally performs. For example, the sound and physical feeling one gets from the crack of the ball off the exact sweet spot of the bat in baseball knowing it was a good hit before it even leaves the bat, or the same feeling from a tennis serve as it comes off the sweet spot of the racquet, or the perfect approach, timing, technique and crushing of the ball on a spike in volleyball. These types of intrinsic feelings, for me, became so strong that they developed into the main focus of my training, and the fun behind why I competed. Don’t get me wrong, I loved to win and hated to lose; it was just that I placed a much higher priority on trying to master and perfect skills, and perform those skills in competition, than just winning the competition itself. I loved the feeling of moving and catching a tough ground ball right in the center pocket of my glove in my younger days of little league, and hitting a solid forehand or backhand in tennis executing the appropriate spin for the shot (one reason why I still play tennis), and performing a swinging movement in gymnastics without any wobble or extra swing in the still rings event. This was where I derived my enjoyment, or fun, from playing and competing in sports, and it is where I developed a true understanding of the intrinsic value behind my own sports participation. What this type of perspective did was allow me to enjoy my athletic experiences based solely on aspects that I controlled; they were intrinsic. I placed less importance on the win itself and more importance on the process, which, in turn, greatly increased my chances of reaching my potential.

This type of perception is a point of view that I do not see held by many and thus, is not stressed as a focus in youth sports today, and it should be. Younger athletes should be encouraged to take great pride on being able to accomplish, improve on, or master something today that they could not do yesterday. It should be of primary importance and take precedence over emphasis on any one win or competition. Doing so will place winning right where it should be, as an outcome of the efforts you put in, and allow young athletes to truly enjoy their sports experiences for years to come.

Photographs provided by: Richard M. Cook, Frank Angileri, and Bill Hois


Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion

5
Average: 5 (1 vote)

Part 2: Specialization in Youth Sports, Good or Bad?

I suppose the best answer to this question of specialization in sports (and I know I might get some grief for this) is that there really is no best or right answer, at least no right answer for everyone and every situation. There are just too many variables in order for one answer to truly be beneficial for all. In fact, doing so would not only be inappropriate but completely unfair to the athlete and/or situation they might be faced with. So, even though it might seem vague at first, let’s start with some general guidelines (and I do mean general; some will even come up with scenarios that would simply not fit these general guidelines either).

I do, in general, believe that young people who participate in sports should, within reason (too many is not good either), participate in a variety of sports. There are several reasons behind this, not the least of which is to help them become more well-rounded individuals. Young athletes should learn and know how to run, jump, shuffle, sprint, jog, hop, and skip along with catching, throwing, shooting, balancing, kicking, batting, etc. All of these skills combine to make a well-coordinated individual, giving them the opportunity to choose a variety of activities throughout life to keep them fit and healthy. The physical and developmental benefits of doing this cannot be argued with. I also believe, again in general, that specializing at a young age does not take into account different rates of maturing, genetic makeup and talent, nor the changing level of interest that young people tend to go through as they grow and get older. So specializing, for most, at too young of an age pigeonholes kids, decreasing their opportunity to make choices and develop other interests and talents. Remember that the biggest, strongest, fastest kid at 7, 8 and 9 years old is rarely in the same position as a teenager. You just never know. And all of these factors are in addition to the increased risk of overuse injury that seems to be attributed to so much repetition occurring, especially at younger ages, when one participates/practices in the same activity all the time

Having said all of that, there does come a time when an athlete may want to consider moving from a framework of playing several sports to one where they narrow their focus and choices down, and yes, even down to only one sport (depending on the individual and/or sport). As far as when that best time is, I can only make a suggestion, and for most, in general, that suggestion would be in high school. Say, somewhere after their freshman year.

With regard to what factors determine whether this is the right decision, well, there are several that an athlete can rely on to help settle on what is best for them. First, would be the level of interest and desire the athlete has for specializing in a sport. And most importantly, and certainly relative to their interest/desire, are the objectives or goals they are seeking to achieve in that sport. For example, there unquestionably is a difference between an athlete who just wants to play sports because they are fun and they love to compete, and the athlete who is looking to compete at the Division I level on scholarship at college. In addition, there is also a difference between these two types of athlete above and the one who is looking to achieve elite/national, Olympic, or professional status. Basically, the higher the interest/desire and level, or goal, the athlete is looking to achieve, the greater the likelihood there is a need for specialization. In fact, there is solid research out there that shows that athletes need about 10 years and/or 10,000 hours of practice in order to reach what one might consider “expert” levels of performance, say the kind of mastery that would take on athlete to the national, Olympic, or professional levels.

This is why it is essential that each athlete look at their situation as an individual first and foremost, taking into account all the factors (talent, interest/desire, objectives/goals, current level of play, etc.) that impact where they are, where they want to be, and what they want to get out of their sports participation in order to make the best decision for themselves. The athlete who is merely looking to play high school sports should, in all likelihood, participate in all the sports they truly have an interest in and can realistically fit into their schedule, while the athlete looking for a higher level of mastery based on what they are looking to achieve will be the ones having to consider the route of specialization.

Before I continue, I do want to make a point regarding the low percentage of athletes who make it to the college level of sports on scholarship, let alone the elite/national, Olympic, and/or professional levels. It is a fact that only a very small percentage (I believe it’s less than 1 or 2 percent) of all young athletes who play sports will ever reach college scholarship status. And the percentage of athletes who reach levels even higher than this are much lower, the chances are very remote. So many may ask the question, “Why dedicate so much energy and time to playing one sport when the possibility of achieving goals, as you describe, are so low, and/or, if so many ‘fail’ to achieve what they want, even if they choose to specialize, isn’t what they are going to lose of far greater importance?” These are very good questions. However, this is where keeping sports participation in perspective is so important. It is not the “reward” (the scholarship, state, national, and/or Olympic championships) that should be of utmost importance, but going through the process of trying to achieve these goals that holds the most value to an athlete working toward objectives like this. This process far outweighs the extrinsic reward they may or may not receive through their efforts. It brings intrinsic value to them that can then be applied to other aspects of their lives.

Let’ say, for arguments sake, a young athlete dedicates themselves to becoming a state champion in swimming, and the only way they see this happening (for them) is through specializing in that one sport. They work very hard, putting in many hours and giving it everything they have; however, in their last season of high school (their senior year) they end up 2nd, 3rd, or maybe even lower. Now I know they may initially feel very disappointed, maybe even that they failed, but have they truly learned any less than if they had taken first and won that state championship? In reality, what they learned about themselves through their efforts, about what it takes to achieve something, and about who they are on the inside has so much more value to them than that first place medal would have had hanging around their neck. I am sure they wouldn’t see it that way initially, but they would someday.

You don’t have to just take my word for it, ask those who have been through it. If you were to ask a former National Champion athlete if they had taken second instead of first, would all of their efforts have gone for naught, I don’t think they would say that that was the case. I know I wouldn’t.

Article #3 will take a closer look at specialization with regard to the type of sport itself. Don’t miss this final piece to the puzzle of specialization, good or bad?


Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion

0

CNN.com article on “Youth sports drawing more than ever” by Laura Hilgers

In my last blog post The “FUN” in Sports Participation, I make reference to the large number of youngsters involved in sports using figures reported by the National Council of Youth Sports (NCYS) in their 2000 census. I state in the blog that these numbers, 32 million, are not likely to decrease in the future.

I recently came across an article in “Kids Sports” on CNN.com by Laura Hilgers that currently estimates this number of competitive youth sports participants to be somewhere around 41 million. On average, that is about a 1+ million per year increase over the last 8 years, very substantial to say the least. That is a lot of kids, and with that huge number of young participants comes the ability to either positively or negatively impact them through the athletic experiences they have. It is not something we, as a sports involved society, should take lightly. There are other highlights in the article that bring into better focus several of the positive aspects of competitive sports in addition to emphasizing the loss of perspective I have discussed in previous blogs. Ms. Hilgers, using Dr. Dan Gould’s (director of the Institute for the Study of Youth Sport at Michigan State University) expertise, also details the large amount of time it actually takes for any one athlete to master their sport and the pressure parents are putting on their kids to specialize and cram all this training in, in their “first two years.” The first two parts of this statement by Dr. Gould, the time it takes for mastery and specialization, are points I have heard many others allude to in the past.

At this point, I will not try to identify whether the hours spent in becoming an “expert” or specializing in any one sport are a good or bad thing, other than to state that both are very dependant on the situation and individual athlete. There are just too many important questions to be asked and answered (i.e. at what age, for what purpose, what is there to gain, what is there to lose, etc.) before any conclusion can be made. As a matter of fact, I don’t think anyone can or should dictate a global response to these two debatable ideas. These two ideas of hours spent for mastery and specialization, however, may be something I address in a future blog.

Ms. Hilgers’ article identifies several significant issues, on both sides of the coin, and presents information that helps broaden the perspective of understanding for anyone involved with kids and sports. It is another good read I would recommend.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/03/rise.kids.sports/index.html?iref=newssearch

By Laura Hilgers
Special to CNN.com


Kirk Mango
Becoming a True Champion

4
Average: 4 (1 vote)